Intuitively this sounds just right, though I am not quiet sure yet how
to apply this to our case. Need to do more investigation when I get
back from vacation.
Andrus
On Dec 22, 2003, at 6:37 AM, Andriy Shapochka wrote:
> What would you say about passing the info "those and those
> *DbRelationships*
> changed." First, all our ObjRelationships are always based on
> DbRelationships. Second, if a data row for a given DbEntity gets
> modified
> (deleted) we should always be able to track which DbRelationships get
> affected by this modification, just like any relational database
> engine can
> instantly recognaze an FK->PK relationship is modified when a
> participating
> table is edited.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Dec 23 2003 - 19:35:12 EST