Ah. I've always ignored that since I don't have Oracle.
So, if it is checked, have PostgreSQL adapter use sequences, otherwise
use PK table? I'd think the GUI would need to be tweaked, too (an
Oracle part and a PostgreSQL part)?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienen..mail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:09 AM
To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
Subject: Re: Cayenne 1.2 + PostgreSQL
Second half of the DbEntity "Entity tab"
"Customize PK generation"
On 9/6/05, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) <michael_gentr..anniemae.com>
wrote:
> I don't know ... Is that "to sequence or not to sequence" in the
> modeler? I don't see it in mine. I don't have Oracle, either.
>
> I'm not opposed to the sequences, I just think there should be
> relatively transparent support for the auto_pk_support table and/or
> sequences, especially for existing data.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienen..mail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
> Subject: Re: Cayenne 1.2 + PostgreSQL
>
>
> Why can't PSQL use the same "to sequence or not to sequence" option
> preferences that are available for Oracle?
>
> On 9/6/05, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) <michael_gentr..anniemae.com>
> wrote:
> > Or just have an option in the modeler to choose which scheme to use
> and
> > let the adapter use the original or new scheme based on the setting?
> >
> > /dev/mrg
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:52 AM
> > To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
> > Subject: Re: Cayenne 1.2 + PostgreSQL
> >
> >
> > Right, if you go from 1.1 to 1.2 on PostgreSQL, you'd have to create
> > PK sequences. I guess what we can do to make it smoother is
extending
> > sequence creation syntax to pick current max value per CAY-314:
> >
> > select setval('pk_my_table', coalesce(max(id) + 1, 200)) from
my_table
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> >
> > > I've been flopping between 1.1 and 1.2 and when I tried running
one
> of
> > > my demo apps, written using 1.1, under 1.2 with PostgreSQL it
> > > completely
> > > bombed. I couldn't do INSERTs at all because it kept doing a
SELECT
> > > nextval('pk_table') to try to get primary keys. Well, being a 1.1
> > > application, I didn't have sequences in my database, I had the
> > > auto_pk_support table for primary keys.
> > >
> > > Does this mean if someone has something written in 1.1/PostgreSQL
> and
> > > then tries to use 1.2, they have migration problems?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > /dev/mrg
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 11:20:04 EDT