On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Argh.. According to their website, SourceForge "fixes" pserver
> access almost every month. I guess there is no more hope this will
> ever happen.
>
> As for the "strong mentality", I like Subversion too. My only
> concern is Subclipse plugin quality. While CVS plugin for Eclipse
> makes CVS limitations next to invisible, from my earlier experience
> Subclipse had so many problems of its own, that I had to use
> command line most of the time ...
Perhaps I was mistaken then. FWIW, in the past three releases,
Subclipse has advanced tremendously. I urge you to give it a go.
> svn status |grep "^\?" |awk '{print $2}' |xargs svn add
>
> fun, isn't it :-)
You and Michael with your voodoo tools.
>
> Latest feedback on that isn't very reassuring either:
>
> http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/
> 2005/06/0026.html
>
> Other than that, it is was mainly sysadmin concerns, nothing along
> the lines of "cvs vs. svn". I guess I should try Subclipse again.
> If the experience is bearable, it may become a strong enough
> incentive to do the switch.
Like I said, 0.9.33 is really quite good. It bundles JavaSVN now
too, so if you have JavaHL headaches, you can always just use JavaSVN
and get rid of them.
-- Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:37:32 EDT