On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:46:18 -0400, Andrus Adamchik
<andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> On the other end of the spectrum you have a 200K library and we are only
> using 2 classes out of it (BeanUtils).
Fair enough.
> Here comes the beauty of BSD license and copy/paste. BTW, just recently
> I had to rewrite a half-way done JDOM app to stick with DOM (the
> motivation was performance - I had to provide a downstream piece of code
> with a DOM tree, so it didn't make sense to keep JDOM around). It was
> trivial, took maybe an hour. JDOM is more Java friendly than DOM, but it
> is basically the same exact thing.
Interesting. Maybe it won't be that bad after all ;-)
>
> I already said - if this is easy, let's do it. If not, JDOM is fine...
> Refactoring back to the older version of JDOM seems like a waste though.
>
Yeah, JDOM was just an illustrative example. You could substitute any lib
in there, but I get your point.
>> Actually, come to think of it, I'm not even sure what the goals of 1.2
>> were. I like what I'm seeing for sure, but I'm not sure what the
>> destination is.
>
> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/1.2+User+Guide
>
> That's what we have - sorry, I am not a blogger-type...:-)
Ahh, I really need to read things more often. I guess I never expect it
to appear under the user guide :-P
-- Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Oct 08 2005 - 09:00:28 EDT