Multi tier name ideas?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Nov 08 2005 - 04:22:42 EST

  • Next message: Watkins, Garry: "RE: Multi tier name ideas?"

    Hi folks,

    I've been looking for a better name to describe the multi-tier
    technology that is being developed now. I am not entirely satisfied
    with either of the names that were used in the course of the
    development:

    * Apple calls a similar feature "Java Client" which was always
    confusing to me (besides Cayenne doesn't deal with UI widgets at all).
    * "Distributed Cayenne" invokes an incorrect clustering association.
    * "Three-tier" overlooked seemingly the most common web service use
    pattern in the enterprise - unorganized ad hoc web services wrapping
    legacy code. So it is entirely possible to have two server
    applications, with one acting as a client of another.
    * This is where "Multi-tier" came from. I think it is still confusing
    though - it is not clear to an uninitiated person what those tiers
    are, and will require a lengthy explanation ... over and over again.

    Should we just call it OPP ("Object Persistence Protocol") after the
    namesake Java package that defines communication interfaces to build
    the hierarchy of ObjectContexts? It is not as catchy, but at least it
    doesn't create wrong associations.

    Any better ideas?

    Andrus

      



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 08 2005 - 04:22:47 EST