So I guess the question is "Are you down with OPP?" ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 4:23 AM
To: Cayenne Devel
Subject: Multi tier name ideas?
Hi folks,
I've been looking for a better name to describe the multi-tier
technology that is being developed now. I am not entirely satisfied with
either of the names that were used in the course of the
development:
* Apple calls a similar feature "Java Client" which was always confusing
to me (besides Cayenne doesn't deal with UI widgets at all).
* "Distributed Cayenne" invokes an incorrect clustering association.
* "Three-tier" overlooked seemingly the most common web service use
pattern in the enterprise - unorganized ad hoc web services wrapping
legacy code. So it is entirely possible to have two server applications,
with one acting as a client of another.
* This is where "Multi-tier" came from. I think it is still confusing
though - it is not clear to an uninitiated person what those tiers are,
and will require a lengthy explanation ... over and over again.
Should we just call it OPP ("Object Persistence Protocol") after the
namesake Java package that defines communication interfaces to build the
hierarchy of ObjectContexts? It is not as catchy, but at least it
doesn't create wrong associations.
Any better ideas?
Andrus
Confidential & Privileged
Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the information contained in this communication is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product. This communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or otherwise--which you may have of this communication.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 08 2005 - 09:33:37 EST