Re: Does it make sense to move 1.2 branch to Apache?

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:58:50 EDT

  • Next message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Does it make sense to move 1.2 branch to Apache?"

    Yes, we have a 2.0 roadmap, but I don't think it has much visibility
    outside of developers and power users, and we're not easily confused.

    However, I think someone could reasonably expect to go from 1.2 to 1.3
    and not have everything completely break. That would be a far more
    confusing situation in my opinion.

    On 4/7/06, Cris Daniluk <cris.danilu..mail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > I'm with Cris on this. +1 for migrating all history into apache SVN.
    > > +1 for a "repackaging" release of cayenne with a minimal amount of
    > > code changes. I think doing this right after the 1.2 release makes a
    > > great deal of sense. I'd recommend calling it 2.0 rather than "apache
    > > 1.2" though since it's no longer backwards compatible.
    > >
    >
    >
    > We have a 2.0 roadmap, so it might be confusing. Hmm... we could always
    > start the versioning over at Apache Cayenne 1.0, but that might be even more
    > confusing! Agree on not calling it "1.2 apache" though.
    >
    > Cris
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:59:15 EDT