RE: Does it make sense to move 1.2 branch to Apache?

From: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\) ("Gentry,)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:59:17 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Does it make sense to move 1.2 branch to Apache?"

    Well, we could rename the roadmap to 2.1 ...

    I was actually thinking last week there is enough new stuff in 1.2 that
    it probably really should be a 2.0 release -- not only for technical
    reasons, but also marketing/political. 1.x makes Cayenne sound a lot
    less mature than it really is. Especially with Hibernate at 3.x. And
    then we are talking about EJB 3 support. Maybe 2.0 should be the
    initial Apache release and 3.0 the next roadmap or something?

    I think I'd want to keep the bug-fixes for the objectstyle packages on
    sourceforge. We can always apply those fixes to both sides so they are
    on the Apache packages, too.

    Thanks,

    /dev/mrg

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Cris Daniluk [mailto:cris.danilu..mail.com]
    Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:51 AM
    To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Does it make sense to move 1.2 branch to Apache?

    >
    >
    > I'm with Cris on this. +1 for migrating all history into apache SVN.
    > +1 for a "repackaging" release of cayenne with a minimal amount of
    > code changes. I think doing this right after the 1.2 release makes a
    > great deal of sense. I'd recommend calling it 2.0 rather than "apache
    > 1.2" though since it's no longer backwards compatible.
    >

    We have a 2.0 roadmap, so it might be confusing. Hmm... we could always
    start the versioning over at Apache Cayenne 1.0, but that might be even
    more
    confusing! Agree on not calling it "1.2 apache" though.

    Cris

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 07 2006 - 10:59:44 EDT