I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the HEAD
code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta tag - no
big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS - it
worked pretty well.
Andrus
On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.
>
> I'm definitely +1
>
> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Anonymous CVS..F has been down since March. A number of users have
>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
>> rather annoying.
>>
>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep 1.2
>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat May 06 2006 - 16:12:57 EDT