Re: JIRA->SVN links (Re: [DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice)

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun May 07 2006 - 20:53:20 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Proposal for the project "Support for full text search in Cayenne""

    Jeff,

    I was about to ask you to do that. You are ahead of me :-)

    Thanks
    Andrus

    On May 7, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Jeff Turner wrote:

    > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >> Migration is successfully completed. Check ins can resume to the new
    >> location at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
    >> trunk/cayenne/
    >
    > I've enabled the JIRA Subversion integration. Eg:
    >
    > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-261?page=all
    > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-470?page=all
    > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-207?page=all
    >
    > There are plenty of examples, as Andrus has been very good about
    > recording issue keys in commits.
    >
    >
    > --Jeff
    >
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >>
    >> On May 6, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>
    >>> I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
    >>>
    >>> As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the
    >>> HEAD code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta
    >>> tag - no big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS
    >>> - it worked pretty well.
    >>>
    >>> Andrus
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
    >>>> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
    >>>> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like
    >>>> crazy.
    >>>>
    >>>> I'm definitely +1
    >>>>
    >>>> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>>> Anonymous CVS..F has been down since March. A number of users
    >>>>> have
    >>>>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their
    >>>>> custom
    >>>>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
    >>>>> rather annoying.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep
    >>>>> 1.2
    >>>>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep
    >>>>> doing
    >>>>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Andrus
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun May 07 2006 - 20:53:48 EDT