Re: What's next when 1.2 goes final...

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2006 - 19:43:13 EDT

  • Next message: Jean T. Anderson: "Re: What's next when 1.2 goes final..."

    Cliff Schmidt mentioned the header thing in reply to my question. Not
    sure where it originated from. He was giving a 6 hour legal
    presentation (!!!) one day, which I didn't attend because of the bad
    case of ADD :-)

    Regarding missing CLA's, looks like we don't have a solution now.
    Let's follow up on that later. BTW, looks like Andriy is the last
    person who've made big contributions and whose CLA we don't have. And
    he made an effort to send his CLA - so hopefully the ASF received it,
    just overlooked it somehow. So I still hope that this issue will
    resolve itself.

    Andrus

    On Jul 9, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:

    > Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > ...
    >> 2. Migrate to Apache package naming and license. I've heard some
    >> conflicting information at ApacheCon Dublin that the new soon-to-be-
    >> published Apache policy does not require the Apache license header in
    >> the source files. This may simplify the task.
    >
    > hmmm ... I wasn't in Dublin, but can think of two proposed policies
    > that
    > might have been discussed.
    >
    > The first is Cliff Schmidt's proposed third-party license policy here:
    >
    > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
    >
    > The second is Cliff Schmidt gave legal-discus..a heads up about a
    > proposed source file header change back in June [1]. I've been
    > tracking
    > what needs to be done -- I think -- for Derby on DERBY-1377 [2], and
    > that issue has a bunch of pointers into the legal-discus..list which
    > might be helpful. But I'm still waiting for Cliff Schmidt to send
    > email
    > to committer..
    >
    >> (I can't find an earlier
    >> message, I think from Jean, clarifying the procedure for the code
    >> contributed by people whom we couldn't track).
    >
    > If it's the new source header policy I don't think it has much, if
    > anything, to do with obtaining ICLA's from cayenne contributors,
    > including the emeritus contributors. btw, the post mentioning
    > emeritus
    > Cayenne contributors is at [3].
    >
    > I've been watching OFBiz in the Incubator because they have a similar
    > situation. --Or at least I think it's OFBiz. I thought I saw recent
    > Incubator traffic posting which specific code was tied to a
    > contributor
    > they couldn't locate, but I'm not readily spotting it. I'll hunt it
    > down
    > and post it when I find it.
    >
    > -jean
    >
    > [1]
    > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
    > 200606.mbox/%3c1551070F-EDE7-40DC-9C97-79BF24E9FD5..pache.org%3e
    > [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377
    > [3]
    > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cayenne-dev/
    > 200604.mbox/%3c444CF808.807030..ristowhill.com%3e
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jul 09 2006 - 19:44:11 EDT