Re: What's next when 1.2 goes final...

From: Jean T. Anderson (jt..ristowhill.com)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2006 - 19:54:10 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: What's next when 1.2 goes final..."

    Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > Cliff Schmidt mentioned the header thing in reply to my question. Not

    What was your question? --If you mentioned that, I seem to have missed
    it. :-)

     -jean

    > sure where it originated from. He was giving a 6 hour legal
    > presentation (!!!) one day, which I didn't attend because of the bad
    > case of ADD :-)
    >
    > Regarding missing CLA's, looks like we don't have a solution now. Let's
    > follow up on that later. BTW, looks like Andriy is the last person
    > who've made big contributions and whose CLA we don't have. And he made
    > an effort to send his CLA - so hopefully the ASF received it, just
    > overlooked it somehow. So I still hope that this issue will resolve
    > itself.
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On Jul 9, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
    >
    >> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >> ...
    >>
    >>> 2. Migrate to Apache package naming and license. I've heard some
    >>> conflicting information at ApacheCon Dublin that the new soon-to-be-
    >>> published Apache policy does not require the Apache license header in
    >>> the source files. This may simplify the task.
    >>
    >>
    >> hmmm ... I wasn't in Dublin, but can think of two proposed policies that
    >> might have been discussed.
    >>
    >> The first is Cliff Schmidt's proposed third-party license policy here:
    >>
    >> http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
    >>
    >> The second is Cliff Schmidt gave legal-discus..a heads up about a
    >> proposed source file header change back in June [1]. I've been tracking
    >> what needs to be done -- I think -- for Derby on DERBY-1377 [2], and
    >> that issue has a bunch of pointers into the legal-discus..list which
    >> might be helpful. But I'm still waiting for Cliff Schmidt to send email
    >> to committer..
    >>
    >>> (I can't find an earlier
    >>> message, I think from Jean, clarifying the procedure for the code
    >>> contributed by people whom we couldn't track).
    >>
    >>
    >> If it's the new source header policy I don't think it has much, if
    >> anything, to do with obtaining ICLA's from cayenne contributors,
    >> including the emeritus contributors. btw, the post mentioning emeritus
    >> Cayenne contributors is at [3].
    >>
    >> I've been watching OFBiz in the Incubator because they have a similar
    >> situation. --Or at least I think it's OFBiz. I thought I saw recent
    >> Incubator traffic posting which specific code was tied to a contributor
    >> they couldn't locate, but I'm not readily spotting it. I'll hunt it down
    >> and post it when I find it.
    >>
    >> -jean
    >>
    >> [1]
    >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
    >> 200606.mbox/%3c1551070F-EDE7-40DC-9C97-79BF24E9FD5..pache.org%3e
    >> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377
    >> [3]
    >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cayenne-dev/
    >> 200604.mbox/%3c444CF808.807030..ristowhill.com%3e
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jul 09 2006 - 19:54:48 EDT