On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:04 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 12, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> Not to confuse things even more, but even if 1.2 were an Apache
>>> Incubator release it wouldn't be fully endorsed by the ASF.
>>> Quoting from
>>> the branding page, incubation indicates "that the project has
>>> yet to be
>>> fully endorsed by the ASF."
>>
>> True, but this doesn't contradict what I wrote there (1.2 is ot
>> endorsed). Still if anyone can suggest a better wording, please
>> do. Or
>> even better - go ahead and change it on Wiki.
>
> ah -- but changing it requires access to the private Wiki.
>
> I should have mentioned this with Andrus' first post. I'm
> fundamentally
> opposed to a committers-only Wiki. I don't think you'll find any
> private
> project Wikis at Apache.
>
> Developing anything in private, even a blog announcement, sets a
> slippery precedent.
I tend to agree. Despite the amount of good solid work being
done on the Project, I'm not seeing it really *becoming*
an ASF project. Private Wikis, external infrastructure and
what appears to be slow lagging transition towards
"just" the ASF are items that need to be addressed.
It's like someone engaged to be married but still dating
their old girl-friend. "I'm breaking it off... really, I
am!" :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 13 2006 - 08:34:28 EDT