Re: Platonos PluginEngine

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Thu Jul 27 2006 - 10:36:41 EDT

  • Next message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Alternative ROP?"

    On Jul 27, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:

    > I tend to lean towards OSGi because its standard and will afford us
    > the opportunity to replace the impl with a different impl if
    > needed. Also we can use plugins that are not intended for our stuff
    > in our stuff if we have OSGi. I'm sure its not as easy as grabbing
    > the jar but it would be cool to be able to integrate some of the
    > eclipse plugins (GEF, GEM etc).

    Interoperability is certainly an important consideration. In the past
    I found it the hard way :-)

    So I have a few questions as I am fully ignorant of OSGI:

    1. Is Eclipse OSGi-compatible now, or is this just a future goal? For
    instance does it mean that if we write an OSGi Modeler plugin, can we
    deploy it in Eclipse, even if it is a separate Swing frame?

    2. What are the core differences between OSGI and Platonos (and
    corollary to that - is it possible to make Platonos a tight subset of
    OSGi, or are they totally incompatible).

    Pardon if those look like stupid questions to a more informed person.
    I am trying to see if we can get the best of both worlds - a small
    plugin runtime and a possibility of extension.

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 27 2006 - 10:37:01 EDT