Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> 1. A release manager (me) posts the release files on people.apache.org
>> 2. Internal vote and review within the project starts (who has a
>> binding vote? PPMC or all committers? I'd say each committer should
>> get a vote).
by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended,
right? --that's correct.
> Everyone gets a vote. Only PPMC members have binding votes.
>
>> 3. Once we pass that (72 hours??), we start the vote on the Incubator
>> list (how many votes do we need there?)
>
> I think it's a majority, although we need at least three binding
> positive votes.
>
Here's an additional resource with current info:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
So, 3 +1 votes on cayenne-dev with PPMC member votes binding. Also, 3
Incubator PMC votes are required for the Incubator to approve it
(Incubator PMC members are listed at
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html).
>> 4. Once we get through that, we post the release on Apache mirrors
>> (how?)
>
> Haven't been involved in this area.
I think Incubator releases still go up on
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/ but it would be good to check
genera..ncubator.apache.org archives to see if that's still the case.
And if it isn't clear, post to genera...a.o -- then we can contribute
that info to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html .
-jean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Sep 17 2006 - 19:55:20 EDT