Thanks Jean for clarification.
Answering your question...
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended,
> right?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
Andrus
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> On 9/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. A release manager (me) posts the release files on
>>> people.apache.org
>>> 2. Internal vote and review within the project starts (who has a
>>> binding vote? PPMC or all committers? I'd say each committer should
>>> get a vote).
>
> by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended,
> right? --that's correct.
>
>> Everyone gets a vote. Only PPMC members have binding votes.
>>
>>> 3. Once we pass that (72 hours??), we start the vote on the
>>> Incubator
>>> list (how many votes do we need there?)
>>
>> I think it's a majority, although we need at least three binding
>> positive votes.
>>
>
> Here's an additional resource with current info:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> So, 3 +1 votes on cayenne-dev with PPMC member votes binding. Also, 3
> Incubator PMC votes are required for the Incubator to approve it
> (Incubator PMC members are listed at
> http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html).
>
>>> 4. Once we get through that, we post the release on Apache mirrors
>>> (how?)
>>
>> Haven't been involved in this area.
>
> I think Incubator releases still go up on
> http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/ but it would be good to check
> genera..ncubator.apache.org archives to see if that's still the case.
> And if it isn't clear, post to genera...a.o -- then we can contribute
> that info to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/
> releasemanagement.html .
>
> -jean
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:01:46 EDT