Re: [REVIEW] Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:06:00 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [REVIEW] Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release"

    I grep'd the previous message for WARN, I think it is false
    positives. E.g.: DomainDisplayEvent, that has package name preceding
    the license:

    package org.apache.cayenne.modeler.event;
    /*****************************************************************
      * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
      * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
      * distributed with this work for additional information...

    I guess we should fix them on trunk and 2.0 branch to avoid further
    warnings, but I guess it

    Re: "Insert new license" message - those are the files generated by
    the tools used in the examples (such as
    UntitledDomainNode.driver.xml). I think we discussed before that
    those do not require licensing headers.

    Andrus

    On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:

    > Jean T. Anderson wrote:
    > ...
    >> I'm attaching the complete "cayenne.log" report just in case any
    >> of the
    >> "New licenses would be inserted in 40 files." and "WARNING: 5
    >> files had
    >> another license as well as the new" reports amount to anything.
    > ...
    > ouch! I didn't look first to see how big that file was -- my
    > apologies!
    > It's not clear to me that the entire file actually got posted to the
    > list. If anybody wants it, let me know and I'll forward it to you.
    >
    > -jean
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:06:11 EDT