Re: [REVIEW] Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release

From: Jean T. Anderson (jt..ristowhill.com)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:46:53 EDT

  • Next message: Jean T. Anderson: "Re: [REVIEW] Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release"

    Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > I grep'd the previous message for WARN, I think it is false positives.
    > E.g.: DomainDisplayEvent, that has package name preceding the license:
    >
    > package org.apache.cayenne.modeler.event;
    > /*****************************************************************
    > * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
    > * distributed with this work for additional information...
    >
    > I guess we should fix them on trunk and 2.0 branch to avoid further
    > warnings, but I guess it

    the tool isn't savvy enough. That's ok -- it's just a tool to hopefully
    catch anything that was missed.

    > Re: "Insert new license" message - those are the files generated by the
    > tools used in the examples (such as UntitledDomainNode.driver.xml). I
    > think we discussed before that those do not require licensing headers.

    oh that's right! I do remember now.

     -jean



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:47:02 EDT