Should we wait for others to chime in before making the change?
-- Kevin> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM > To: de..ayenne.apache.org > Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap > > Even better :-) > > I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let > me know if this wasn't enough to edit the versions. > > Andrus > > > On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > > I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer > selectable in any > > of the issue filings. For instance, we'd probably archive > 1.2, 1.2.1, > > 2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as "affects" or "fix > > version". > > Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and > > 2.0.3 > > available as fix versions. Versions that are archived still retain > > their changelogs though. So, I think that would address > your concern. > > > > I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's > > available in the version the ASF runs. A JIRA admin would have to > > look into that. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM > >> To: de..ayenne.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> The downside is that we'll have a very long list of versions, with > >> higher probability of making a mistake when picking one. > >> But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the > RELEASE-NOTES can > >> be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a > >> particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt is built > >> manually). > >> > >> Andrus > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 13 2007 - 23:24:34 EST