Sure, lets wait for another day or two to establish lazy consensus.
Andrus
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Should we wait for others to chime in before making the change?
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM
>> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
>>
>> Even better :-)
>>
>> I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let
>> me know if this wasn't enough to edit the versions.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>
>>> I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer
>> selectable in any
>>> of the issue filings. For instance, we'd probably archive
>> 1.2, 1.2.1,
>>> 2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as "affects" or "fix
>>> version".
>>> Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and
>>> 2.0.3
>>> available as fix versions. Versions that are archived still retain
>>> their changelogs though. So, I think that would address
>> your concern.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's
>>> available in the version the ASF runs. A JIRA admin would have to
>>> look into that.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM
>>>> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> The downside is that we'll have a very long list of versions, with
>>>> higher probability of making a mistake when picking one.
>>>> But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the
>> RELEASE-NOTES can
>>>> be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a
>>>> particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt is built
>>>> manually).
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 14 2007 - 09:19:05 EST