Actually, looking again, I may just lack permissions.
Andrus, can you bulk edit closed issues? You can verify by clicking
the "closed" link from the main Cayenne JIRA page. Then in the
upper-right, click the "all 592 issue(s)" next to the "Bulk Change"
label. Select a few issues, click "Next". Then check if you can "Edit
Issues" in the next step. I only have "Transition Issues" and "Delete
Issues" available to me . . .
If you can actually edit issues, we may not need to get the infra guys
involved at all.
Thanks,
Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Menard [mailto:kmenar..ervprise.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 11:32 AM
> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> Subject: RE: JIRA changelog & roadmap
>
> Okay, this is actually a bit more complicated than I had
> hoped. The issue is that the workflow used by the ASF JIRA
> does not allow for bulk editing for closed issues. So, our
> three options are:
>
> 1) Say forget it.
> 2) Re-open the "incorrect" closed issues and then close them
> again with the new fix version.
> 3) Request the infra folks involved to modify or create a new
> workflow per [1].
>
> I'm still a fan of the change, but it appears I'm the only
> one to have complained thus far, so 1) may be a viable
> option. 2) we can do on our own. We'll just see a temporary
> flood of email as the issues are opened and then closed
> (maybe about 20 total). 3) seems like a better long term
> solution, but requires outside assistance that may not be granted.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1]
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/workflow.ht
> ml#unedita
> ble_steps
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM
> > To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> >
> > Even better :-)
> >
> > I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let
> me know if
> > this wasn't enough to edit the versions.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >
> > > I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer
> > selectable in any
> > > of the issue filings. For instance, we'd probably archive
> > 1.2, 1.2.1,
> > > 2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as
> "affects" or "fix
> > > version".
> > > Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and
> > > 2.0.3
> > > available as fix versions. Versions that are archived
> still retain
> > > their changelogs though. So, I think that would address
> > your concern.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's
> > > available in the version the ASF runs. A JIRA admin
> would have to
> > > look into that.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM
> > >> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> The downside is that we'll have a very long list of
> versions, with
> > >> higher probability of making a mistake when picking one.
> > >> But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the
> > RELEASE-NOTES can
> > >> be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a
> > >> particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> is built
> > >> manually).
> > >>
> > >> Andrus
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Feb 17 2007 - 11:38:49 EST