Re: podling BIS notifications (jars in svn & crypto)

From: Jean T. Anderson (jt..ristowhill.com)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2007 - 13:39:46 EST

  • Next message: Dain Sundstrom: "Re: JPA enhancer behavior - fat agent?"

    Jean T. Anderson wrote:
    > Michael Gentry wrote:
    > ...
    >
    >>Mike K. did raise an interesting point about if Cayenne Modeler starts
    >>using Derby instead of HSQL, what does that mean for us? Would we
    >>only need the BIS/etc if we run the preferences DB with encryption (I
    >>can't imagine we would -- no reason to)?
    >
    > And the word from legal-discuss [1] is any project that includes derby
    > (or any other Apache product listed at
    > http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/), must also do the BIS
    > notification.

    and if you only use Derby and don't include source or jars, no
    notification is needed:

    http://tinyurl.com/2qu6eq
    http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200702.mbox/%3cc5e632550702220946i1b5b599cwd1dccfb79436fba..ail.gmail.com%3e

     -jean

    > It doesn't matter if you don't use derby's encryption capability -- the
    > capability is still there in the derby jar Cayenne includes.
    >
    > fortunately doing the BIS notification itself turns out to actually be
    > straight forward -- imho the hard part has been to understand if you
    > need to do it or not. The steps to follow are outlined at
    > http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html.
    >
    > -jean
    >
    >
    > [1] http://tinyurl.com/yq75r6
    > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200702.mbox/%3cc5e632550702212131g17f051cr724f886bd972cd0..ail.gmail.com%3e

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 22 2007 - 13:40:17 EST