+1.
I should be able to carry my changes over fairly easily. They're mostly
Velocity template changes at the moment.
I especially agree with documenting items as we make them generic. There's
a lot of Object accesses that are a bit confusing in the code.
-- KevinOn 11/13/07 6:09 PM, "Aristedes Maniatis" <ar..sh.com.au> wrote:
> > On 14/11/2007, at 8:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> So I guess we are now in a good shape to proceed with the switch. >> Any objections to me doing it sometime between tomorrow and Saturday? > > For me it is a good time. I've only got about a dozen uncommitted > changes right now and they should be trivial to move across. Kevin > might have a bigger set of patches for his work on ROP, but I'm sure > they will be easy to move into a different folder. > > I guess we should each pitch in as time permits to implement generics > in the code where the way to do so is obvious. From experience on my > own project this is a good time to also add javadocs which describe > what those lists and maps actually represent throughout the code.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:43:11 EST