Starting that now. Stay tuned.
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> +1.
>
> I should be able to carry my changes over fairly easily. They're
> mostly
> Velocity template changes at the moment.
>
> I especially agree with documenting items as we make them generic.
> There's
> a lot of Object accesses that are a bit confusing in the code.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
> On 11/13/07 6:09 PM, "Aristedes Maniatis" <ar..sh.com.au> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14/11/2007, at 8:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> So I guess we are now in a good shape to proceed with the switch.
>>> Any objections to me doing it sometime between tomorrow and
>>> Saturday?
>>
>> For me it is a good time. I've only got about a dozen uncommitted
>> changes right now and they should be trivial to move across. Kevin
>> might have a bigger set of patches for his work on ROP, but I'm sure
>> they will be easy to move into a different folder.
>>
>> I guess we should each pitch in as time permits to implement generics
>> in the code where the way to do so is obvious. From experience on my
>> own project this is a good time to also add javadocs which describe
>> what those lists and maps actually represent throughout the code.
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 18:29:28 EST