If we are to add this package, I'd rather we go the route we took with
jedit-syntax - submit it to the main Maven repo ourselves. Pointing to
JBoss repo is a bad idea IMO, and has a potential of leading to chaos
in our builds.
Also I agree with Ari about not having it as a runtime dependency, and
instead bundling it with the Modeler. There is a lot of value in the
core library to stay lean. Maybe we can access it with reflection from
DbGenerator to prevent a compile dependency?
Andrus
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 28/08/2008, at 4:24 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
>> Inflector package is quite lightweight, so I think it's OK if we
>> add it to
>> core POM (unpublished). I also did not find Inflector in main
>> Apache repo,
>> but I can see it in JBoss repository. Is it fine if we add that
>> repo to the
>> project?
>
> From a licensing perspective, we can include it easily since it
> Apache2 licensed. However it seems to have more of a place in the
> Modeler app and not in the core Cayenne library which should not be
> cluttered with these sorts of things. Are we going to have one for
> every language?
>
> Downloads are here: https://inflector.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList
> but I couldn't see a maven repository for it.
>
> Personally I think this is a red herring and really not very
> important, but if it isn't too much trouble, then I guess it is not
> a bad thing to have.
>
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Aug 28 2008 - 03:59:18 EDT