> Map<String, Object>
One correction... Reading Ari's comment attached to CAY-400, I
realized that I forgot that we also need to store it in XML, so the
Map will be Map<String, String>
Andrus
On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Andrey Razumovsky commented on CAY-400:
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> Well, I think I could work on this one, but my choice is SQL
>> comments in DBobjects, not exactly the idea Andrus originally
>> proposed. Any objections?
>
> I have no problem with the reduced scope. But can we still make it a
> generic property map initialized lazily and attached to DbAtrtribute
> or DbEntity, with comments being just one of the possible fields in
> it? I.e. the idea to group any properties not relevant to Cayenne
> runtime functioning in an untyped Map<String, Object>, instead of
> declaring them as ivars.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 14 2009 - 04:20:18 EDT