On 14/04/2009, at 6:13 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I have no problem with the reduced scope. But can we still make it a
> generic property map initialized lazily and attached to DbAtrtribute
> or DbEntity, with comments being just one of the possible fields in
> it? I.e. the idea to group any properties not relevant to Cayenne
> runtime functioning in an untyped Map<String, Object>, instead of
> declaring them as ivars
Map<String, String> might be easier unless we want to go to the
trouble of typing these objects in both Cayenne modeler with another
popup option and also in the XML. Mostly the user can cast them into
some other data type if needed.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 14 2009 - 04:22:33 EDT