On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:52 PM, jackCHEN wrote:
> I think that the key is needed inside the property. Function of
> property may be extended in future base on the key.
Hi Jack,
This is a possibility, although I can't think of any meaningful
examples right now. During code generation (the main use of
properties) the key will be still available - from the Map<String,
Property> attached to the Element. But until we really need it, I am
in favor of the "less is better" approach.
Cheers,
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 15 2009 - 10:10:21 EDT