I was favoring #1. #2 was just a thought to keep it similar to what
already exists in the Ordering class, but didn't seem as good to me.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Andrus Adamchik
<andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> #1: Call the enum class Order. I think Order.ASCENDING would be
>> readable and intuitive.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> #2: Keep it something more descriptive like OrderingDirection, but in
>> the Ordering class have a "public static final OrderingDirection
>> ASCENDING = OrderingDirection.ASCENDING;". Then you could reference
>> Ordering.ASCENDING (kind of like Ordering.ASC). This seems awkward,
>> though, but makes it similar to what is already there.
>
> Don't understand this one. Why the new Order enum is not sufficient?
>
> Andrus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 23 2009 - 11:27:19 EDT