Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...

From: Andrey Razumovsky (razumovsky.andre..mail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:23:36 EST

  • Next message: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."

    However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically without
    knowing name of relationship... Not sure though

    2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>

    >
    >>
    >> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the
    >> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ; C ->
    >> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective?
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >
    > In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I
    > don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime

    -- 
    Andrey
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:24:32 EST