Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...

From: Andrey Razumovsky (razumovsky.andre..mail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:27:08 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."

    Anyways, I'm ok with reverting CAY-1009 but reopening it for 3.1

    2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>

    > However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically without
    > knowing name of relationship... Not sure though
    >
    > 2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>
    >
    >
    >>>
    >>> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the
    >>> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ; C ->
    >>> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective?
    >>>
    >>> Andrus
    >>>
    >>
    >> In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I
    >> don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Andrey
    >

    -- 
    Andrey
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:34:50 EST