Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372

From: Michael Gentry (mgentr..asslight.net)
Date: Mon Oct 04 2010 - 20:18:39 UTC

  • Next message: Michael Gentry: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372"

    Just tried with -DcayenneTestConnection=h2, which I hadn't used before:

    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 17 seconds
    [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 04 16:17:03 EDT 2010
    [INFO] Final Memory: 101M/309M
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > Just reproduced the errors locally running like this:
    >
    >  mvn clean install -DcayenneTestConnection=h2
    >
    > Could you doublecheck the property name activating the "h2" profile? It is different between 3.0 and 3.1 branches (above is a 3.1 version per http://cayenne.apache.org/running-unit-tests.html ). The new syntax is due to some stupid Hudson limitations on dots in the property names.
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    > On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >> yeah, I'd think so:
    >>
    >> <dependency>
    >>       <groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
    >>       <artifactId>h2</artifactId>
    >>       <version>1.0.64</version>
    >>       <scope>test</scope>
    >> </dependency>
    >>
    >>> I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then.
    >>
    >> All my today's commits resulted in the same failures. Build #373.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hi Andrus,
    >>>
    >>> I saw that error e-mail, but when I built and ran tests I didn't get
    >>> the errors.  Wouldn't the version of H2 to use when running tests be
    >>> specified in the pom.xml and in theory should be the same?  Is this
    >>> still happening?  I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> mrg
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>> Hi Mike (mrg)!
    >>>>
    >>>> Wonder why we are getting a bunch of Hudson H2 errors? Is this a different H2 version compared to what you've tested against?
    >>>>
    >>>> Cheers,
    >>>> Andrus
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> [spew deleted]
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 04 2010 - 20:19:28 UTC