Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372

From: Michael Gentry (mgentr..asslight.net)
Date: Mon Oct 04 2010 - 20:24:01 UTC

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372"

    I hadn't updated since I did the H2 tweak, so I just updated to pick
    up your change and any others. Same story:

    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Total time: 3 minutes 49 seconds
    [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 04 16:22:58 EDT 2010
    [INFO] Final Memory: 101M/309M
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Not sure what is going on with Hudson at the moment.

    mrg

    On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
    > Just tried with -DcayenneTestConnection=h2, which I hadn't used before:
    >
    > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
    > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 17 seconds
    > [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 04 16:17:03 EDT 2010
    > [INFO] Final Memory: 101M/309M
    > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >> Just reproduced the errors locally running like this:
    >>
    >>  mvn clean install -DcayenneTestConnection=h2
    >>
    >> Could you doublecheck the property name activating the "h2" profile? It is different between 3.0 and 3.1 branches (above is a 3.1 version per http://cayenne.apache.org/running-unit-tests.html ). The new syntax is due to some stupid Hudson limitations on dots in the property names.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>
    >>> yeah, I'd think so:
    >>>
    >>> <dependency>
    >>>       <groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
    >>>       <artifactId>h2</artifactId>
    >>>       <version>1.0.64</version>
    >>>       <scope>test</scope>
    >>> </dependency>
    >>>
    >>>> I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then.
    >>>
    >>> All my today's commits resulted in the same failures. Build #373.
    >>>
    >>> Andrus
    >>>
    >>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Hi Andrus,
    >>>>
    >>>> I saw that error e-mail, but when I built and ran tests I didn't get
    >>>> the errors.  Wouldn't the version of H2 to use when running tests be
    >>>> specified in the pom.xml and in theory should be the same?  Is this
    >>>> still happening?  I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>>
    >>>> mrg
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>>> Hi Mike (mrg)!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Wonder why we are getting a bunch of Hudson H2 errors? Is this a different H2 version compared to what you've tested against?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Cheers,
    >>>>> Andrus
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> [spew deleted]
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 04 2010 - 20:24:48 UTC