Hi guys,
Andrus,
I have tried your latest build and it works perfectly. Many thanks! However,
I think I could have noticed another glitch, but let me verify with you, I
could
do some things wrong.
Suppose you have two objects: a Photo and a PhotoType, the relationship
between
them is many-to-many. My mapping of the n:n relationship is done like
described in the manual:
http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/userguide/advmodel/flattenedrel.html
Now if I retieve a existing photo and a type using the primary key:
//Photo
ObjectId oi
= new ObjectId(Foto.class, "id", new Integer("1").intValue());
Photo pto = (Photo) mContext.registeredObject(oi);
//Photo type
ObjectId oi
= new ObjectId(Foto.class, "id", new Integer("2").intValue());
PhotoType pte = (PhotoType) mContext.registeredObject(oi);
If I only want to create a relationship between the two the only code needed
to
do so is:
pto.addToType(pte);
mContext.commitChanges(Level.WARN);
The result is that nothing is being send to my datastore. But, if I do
something
like:
pto.setName("anotherName");
pto.addToType(pte);
mContext.commitChanges();
It works allright. The name is changed and the relationship is created. I
could
of course, remove the object from the datastore and recreate is (mySQL has
no
problem with that), but that seems a bit odd.
Can anyone please tell me how I should deal with this one?
Thanks in advance, Laszlo
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat May 10 2003 - 15:48:10 EDT