Dov,
I'd also recommend to go with 1.2 - we are at the end of the
development cycle, approaching Beta. It will likely save you
migration effort in the nearest future. Even if you may not care
about remote object persistence features, 1.2 still adds lots of
flexibility in other areas, you'll have a much nicer modeler, runtime
database type (and Cayenne adapter) detection, etc.
But as others have mentioned, core API is compatible between 1.1.x
and 1.2, so you shouldn't have much trouble with either.
Andrus
On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> There shouldn't be much of a transition effort to go from 1.1.3 to
> 1.2.x, but if you have a little time on your side for the port, I'd
> go with 1.2.
>
> If you are using PostgreSQL, the 1.2 implementation supports
> sequences by default instead of using a DB table.
>
> Look at http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/1.2+User
> +Guide for some of the changes. Cayenne is sufficiently EOF-like
> that you should be quite happy with it. Plus, we have the source
> code! :-)
>
> /dev/mrg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dov Rosenberg [mailto:dov.rosenber..onviveon.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2:20 PM
> To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org
> Subject: Which version? 1.2 or 1.13
>
> I am looking at porting over an existing EOF based app and see
> there is a new version under development (1.2M7). How stable is
> that build? If I start on 1.13 how much hassle (if any) will I
> encounter upgrading in the future?
>
> Are there any compelling features that would make the 1.2 version
> worthwhile?
>
>
> --
> Dov Rosenberg
> Inquira Inc
> 370 Centerpointe Circle, ste 1178
> Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
> (407) 339-1177 x 102
> (407) 339-6704 (fax)
> drosenber..nquira.com
> AOL IM: dovrosenberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 23 2005 - 06:45:29 EST