Site structure redesign

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sat Sep 09 2006 - 08:08:51 EDT

  • Next message: Borut Bolčina: "Re: Sneak preview of new proposed Cayenne site"

    1. Navigation

    * I like "Home/Documentation/Downloads" split. I'd like to suggest
    two more top-level sections: "Community" and "Development" (maybe
    "Issue Tracking" as well??)
    * I also think 3 sets of navigation are too much (shortcuts section
    can be too limiting - there are more than two things users may want
    to access quickly, I'd rather those are displayed prominently on the
    documentation page).
    * Side menu - maybe each second-level page will have its own small
    side menu (if applicable), without duplicating the entire menu on
    every page?

    2. Home Page

    * (taking this item from my other message) Need a small "latest news"
    section, listing recent news titles (we can automate an update
    process, using RSS, to avoid stale news).
    * +1 for the modeler section with the screenshot.
    * -1 on the supported DB section - maybe replace it with a quick
    summary of features, with a link to a "feature overview" page.

    3. Documentation Page

    * Big +1 for current organization of the top-level documentation
    topics (including splitting the user guide into installation/quick
    start/user guide).
    * Need a clear split between different versions of Cayenne
    documentation (via side menu or tabs?) Side menu is probably more
    scaleable.

    Andrus

    On Sep 9, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
    > On 09/09/2006, at 4:27 AM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
    >
    >> Hello,
    >>
    >> have a look at http://svarog.homeip.net/cayenne/
    >>
    >> Most work is to be invested in documentation section. Properly
    >> divided
    >> sections, PDF versions, ...
    >> Also the right side is empty.
    >>
    >> Suggestions welcome.
    >
    > I think this is an improvement on the current site, but we could do
    > better in some ways:
    >
    > * the design should be css based, not a table based design. This
    > will make it much easier to reskin and update in the future. It
    > also makes it easier to add content over time. A css based design
    > is better for accessibility reasons and better for printing.
    >
    > * it shouldn't be done in Dreamweaver which leaves lots of ugly
    > javascript behind
    >
    > * I don't like navigation which runs in several directions on the
    > site. Here we have primary navigation running across from the top
    > left, which is limiting in its ability to expand to add new items.
    > Then navigation at the top right which also runs across, but to the
    > left, and finally navigation on the right which runs vertically.
    > The problems I have are:
    >
    > - why are there three sets of navigation?
    > - what happens as we want to add navigation to levels 2 and 3 and
    > they collide in the middle on small screens?
    > - what happens on small screens when you can't see the navigation
    > to the right?
    >
    >
    > I'd like to work with Borut and the advances he has made, and
    > furthermore to sponsor our graphic designer to work on the design
    > with us and the community. His work can be seen here: http://
    > www.brucemartin.net/
    >
    >
    > Cheers
    > Ari Maniatis
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > -------------------------->
    > ish
    > http://www.ish.com.au
    > Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
    > phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
    > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Sep 09 2006 - 08:09:11 EDT