On fredag, mar 7, 2003, at 12:06 Europe/Stockholm, Harald Niesche wrote:
> "Anders Peterson" <peterso..ptimatika.se> wrote:
>> They still don't work...
>
> I'll take a look at the wizards later.
Ulrich told me I had to delete the 'output' folder as well (not just
the 'dist' folder). Now I can't build at all. I'll just let it rest for
a while...
>>>> I filed a bug report [ 698610 ] Incremental builder builds
>>>> frameworks
>>>> named *.woa
>>> ... I'll fix this in CVS.
>> It's fixed.
>
> Great, is there a process for this, i.e., do you set the bug to
> "Verifed"?
I don't know. There is no "Verified" Status (or Resolution). What if I
set it to "Deleted" - will it disappear?
>>> started in the debugger. It is not supposed to create deployment
>>> builds.
>>
>> ... and use WOProject/Ant to deploy/install (only).
>
> Exactly, that's the plan.
I like the plan.
>> Either only a dedicated folder (you would have to accept all files) or
>> how about both in combination. You specify.
>> 1) Where to look for resources
>> 2) Which file types to include
>
> The only part I'm not clear on is whether this is "and" or "or" -- do I
> include everything from the specified folders plus everything that
> matches
> the wildcards? Or just stuff from the dedicated folders that also
> matches
> the wildcards?
It's "and".
> I'd like to keep the editor simple for now. How about wildcards that
> can
> contain folder names?
>
> e.g. "Resources/*;*.xml;*.eomodeld/*;*.wo/*"
For now, anything is ok (as long as it works).
>> The Ant script and the incremental builder will use the same
>> configuration - right?
>
> That depends -- we could put the configuration into build.properties,
> but
> then the expressions would have to be Ant compatible -- probably not a
> bad
> thing anyway. (Note to self: Think *before* you write!)
I really think having one set of configurations is a good idea. Being
Ant compatible can't be that must of a restriction.
In the future: There will be no need to choose Ant or Incremental and
no need to turn either of them On/Off. The incremental builder is
always on (why not) and the Ant script is invoked as needed (an Install
Now button).
>> Do you have to generate a new build.xml file? Couldn't a standard
>> build.xml file just read all configurable setting from a separate
>> file,
>> and the incremental builder use the same settings/file?
>
> Well, that's a thought (see above). I'd like WOLips to generate the
> build.xml if it doesn't exist, though (think about converting plain
> Java
> projects by checking "Is a WebObjects project").
As long as I don't have to modify the build.xml file (as I do now).
/Anders
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 06:53:20 EST