Re: CVS and *.eomodeld~ files

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:07:24 EST

  • Next message: Cyril Morisse: "Unable to launch .woa project with eclipse RC1"

    Hi,

    the new Plugin.xml in the WOLips plugin should prevent the default cvs
    control of *.d2wmodel~, *.woa, *.framework and *.emodeld~ .

    Ulrich

    Am Sonntag, 02.03.03 um 15:49 Uhr schrieb Harald Niesche:

    > Anders, everyone:
    >
    >> the cvs version has an option to choose the builder.
    >>
    >> WOBuild in the project properties.
    > <<How do these project properties relate to the WOLips build
    > preferences?>>
    >
    > They are somewhat independent. The incremental build ignores
    > everything set
    > in the preferences (it always runs after the Java Build if it is
    > selected).
    >
    > The Ant build will honor the options set in the preferences and only
    > runs if
    > it is enabled. Switching to the external build gave me errors in the
    > current
    > CVS version (build already running...).
    >
    > <<Should perhaps TargetBuilder also be controlled here?>>
    >
    > Yes, probably. Although I'm not sure if the TargetBuilder is still
    > necessary
    > since Eclipse supports multiple output paths natively. Maybe some of
    > the
    > users could speak up, please?
    >
    > <<There are now 4 ways to build: Internal Ant, External Ant,
    > Incremental
    > and TargetBuilder.>>
    >
    > Well, [internal | external] Ant and the Incremental build try to do
    > the same
    > thing -- create a framework or application bundle from the compiled
    > classes
    > and the (WebServer-)Resources in the project. I'd say these are the two
    > build styles.
    >
    > The TargetBuilder is a replacement for the JavaBuilder that allows
    > more than
    > one output path (which should by now be supported by the Eclipse build
    > stuff). If you use the TargetBuilder you'll also have to use the Ant
    > build,
    > because the incremental build doesn't deal with this structure
    > properly.
    >
    > <<Is the Incremental builder in CVS broken? Should I try to use it, or
    > wait?>>
    >
    > I think I have fixed the stuff in CVS, if you could give the
    > incremental
    > build a try I'd be more than glad to hear about your experience. If
    > you need
    > help figuring out how it should be used, be sure to drop me a line.
    >
    > There are still situations where a rebuild project (or even rebuild
    > all) is
    > needed, if you come across them, I'd also be interested to hear about
    > that.
    >
    > Harald
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:10:36 EST