Re: Accumulated cayenne.jar a bad idea?

From: Holger Hoffstätte (holge..izards.de)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 05:40:49 EST

  • Next message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: jdom obsolete?"

    Some more incoherent Saturday morning thinking.. %)

    > dependencies for themselves; alternatively we could ship the QA'd jars in
    > the lib directory - don't know what kind of license problems this might

    ..meaning:

    - create new directory lib that contains all jars required for
    cayenne-core and modeler at compile/run-time (i.e. for the distribution)

    - keep jars required for tests, regression, ant tasks etc. in otherlib

    - maybe move jars that are only required for examples into <example>/lib,
    WEB-INF or whatever (struts, tapestry, ognl..)

    We have to make it really, really clear what goes where and why.

    -h



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 05:45:57 EST