Re: jdom obsolete?

From: Holger Hoffstätte (holge..izards.de)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 05:11:29 EST

Next message: Scott Finnerty: "Status of BasicServletConfiguration"

Previous message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Accumulated cayenne.jar a bad idea?"
In reply to: Holger Hoffstätte: "jdom obsolete?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> Speaking of jars, I noticed that we have JDOM in otherlib. why? leftover
> from earlier days? The only thing it might be used for is the
> webapp/struts example, but I don't know for sure.

Found it - it's required for building the documentation. It can be taken
out of the IDE classpath, though.

-h

Next message: Scott Finnerty: "Status of BasicServletConfiguration"
Previous message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Accumulated cayenne.jar a bad idea?"
In reply to: Holger Hoffstätte: "jdom obsolete?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 12:13:35 EST