Ok. This is looking as simple as reversing my changes in the original
issue (http://objectstyle.org/jira/browse/CAY-305) and allowing the
default behavior to prefix the table with a schema name.
Shall I assume that the user will manually create the schema in
HSQLDB? I'm guessing that's what we do for Oracle.
One thing I do notice is that the AUTO_PK_SUPPORT table is created in
the default (PUBLIC for HSQLDB) schema, but I guess there's no
reasonable default one could assume short of creating multiple
AUTO_PK_SUPPORT TABLEs, one for each schema.
Also, I'm considering using "HSQLDBNoSchemaAdapter extends
HSQLDBAdapter" as the old behavior. I don't really like the name
HSQLDBAdapter17. Opinions?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 04 2006 - 14:05:14 EDT