Heh, that's actually a more general problem with team development,
both open source and commercial. I've seen people who would not
commit their local work to CVS for weeks or months to postpone
dealing with integration issues :-)
So yes, communicating constant integration paradigm is important. And
providing the right tools is what makes it practical.
Andrus
On May 24, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 5/24/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> It looks like recommending SVK per Kevin's SVK suggestion is a good
>> idea - there won't be a need for the external repo, and it will
>> remove the reviewing bottleneck from the patch process.
>
> Just be sure that you don't end up with the student doing all their
> work locally and not showing it to anyone until it's done. That
> totally defeats the point of open development, peer review, etc.
>
> -garrett
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 24 2006 - 14:30:00 EDT