Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released. I even used mogrify
to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 for license
information." comment to the images. There wasn't enough room to store
the entire license as a comment, so I improvised a bit (there was no
direction on how to handle this in the FAQ/etc).
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dudney [mailto:bdudne..pache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:42 AM
To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org
Subject: headers discussion
HI All,
One last thread tonight...
I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1].
It is a new policy for the license comments in src files.
The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to
what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that
it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform
before the 3.0 release is ready to go.
Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change?
TTFN,
-bd-
[1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Aug 07 2006 - 09:27:11 EDT