Re: Re: Alternative ROP?

From: Watkins, Garry (gwatkin..otleyrice.com)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 21:21:55 EDT

  • Next message: Tore Halset: "[cocoa] first cut"

    I am at wwdc and I can't comment on CD, but I would love to see a ROP solution soon. If you get what I mean. I would be willing to help out.

    Sent by GoodLink (www.good.com)

     -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Gentry [mailto:blacknex..mail.com]
    Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 06:48 PM Eastern Standard Time
    To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Re: Alternative ROP?

    The keynote didn't mention Core Data at all (yes, I watched it all).
    I'm not lucky enough to be at WWDC, so I don't know if they have
    panels on CD or are adding new features (and that would be NDA'ed, but
    a vague [dis|en]couragement from someone in-the-know about adding this
    to Cayenne would be great). I really want to look into this more,
    given a lack of CD support for real databases, but I'm not certain how
    quickly I can get to it.

    /dev/mrg

    PS. Comments always welcome!

    On 8/10/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > I think everybody's waiting for the news from WWDC that is in
    > progress now :-)
    >
    >
    > On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Tore Halset wrote:
    >
    > > Have you (or anyone else?) done any work on this? - the Objective-C/
    > > Cocoa Cayenne ROP client?
    > >
    > > - Tore.
    > >
    > > On Jul 28, 2006, at 02:59, Michael Gentry wrote:
    > >
    > >> How would that be significantly worse than web browser -> web
    > >> application -> database? Is CocoaJava what Apple supports as Cocoa
    > >> using Java? If so, it isn't as supported as native Objective-C (I
    > >> thought I heard it was being phased out, too). Besides, Cocoa
    > >> development (in Objective-C) is fun. But if you have to access a DB,
    > >> Cayenne is the best option currently, so it would be a nice option
    > >> for
    > >> native OS X applications, too.
    > >>
    > >> Just my rambling thoughts ...
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

    Confidential & Privileged

    Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the information contained in this communication is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product. This communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or otherwise--which you may have of this communication.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Aug 10 2006 - 21:22:50 EDT