Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2007 - 16:59:40 EDT

Next message: jerome moliere: "Documentation error/ API consistency / Commons Collections Bug"

Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Testing on Sybase"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Apr 4, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> BTW, can you reproduce it without, just by running multiple
> parallel instances?

that's "reproduce without JMS" :-)

Next message: jerome moliere: "Documentation error/ API consistency / Commons Collections Bug"
Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Testing on Sybase"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 17:04:18 EDT