Re: ROP listener semantics

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2008 - 13:48:30 EST

  • Next message: Scott Anderson: "RE: Storing GMT dates?"

    On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:

    > This is a bit surprising to me, because I think that they do work.
    > For
    > my server class hierarchy I have one base class that I've made
    > implement
    > LifecycleListener. I've done the same for the client classes. In the
    > modeler, I mapped each of these classes as listeners at the DataMap
    > level. I couldn't get it to just acknowledge that these were
    > listeners
    > based on the interface, so I mapped the pre-persist methods for each.
    >
    > I then fired up the server in a debugger and a client in the debugger.
    > Accessing a simple CRUD page in the client, both pre-persist methods
    > were entered: the base server class one and the base client class one.

    Let me investigate. This may have leaked somehow beyond the first tier
    DataContext...

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 26 2008 - 13:49:03 EST