I am leaning towards doing an RC2 before the final. We have 12 issues
marked as fixed since RC1 (mostly minor and/or specific to ROP, but
still). How about an RC2 this Friday (right before ApacheCon)? I am
feeling fairly certain about it being the last RC before final.
Also I branched the main code [1] to be able to check in some new
features I need for work. We'll merge them back to 3.0 when we are
done with 1.2 and 2.0 (have to remember to do that before we rename
the packages).
Andrus
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/branches/
PROTO-3.0/cayenne/
On Jun 11, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I guess we can decide on RC2 vs. final closer to the release date,
> dependning on whether any new major bugs are discovered in the next
> week
> or so (there were hints at concurrency issues of the shared cache
> that I
> want to investigate).
>
> Also I wanted to give heads up on the docs work I am doing now.
> Instead of
> the three current tutorials (that look more like examples), I am
> writing a
> step by step guide showing how to map a DB schema, write a command
> line
> app (demonstrating Cayenne API) and turn it to a web app
> (demonstrating
> deployment tricks, rather than Struts or Tapestry). Once this is
> done, I
> want to extend this tutorial with ROP chapter(s) (something like
> "take an
> existing mapping, turn it to a web service, write a Java client").
>
> This (and general docs update) are the last tasks on my list.
>
> [1] http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/Tutorial+Scratchpad
>
> Andrus
>
>
>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:22:33 -0400, Cris Daniluk
>> <cris.danilu..mail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll probably have the docs finished for tomorrow. There's still
>>> some
>>> more stuff I want to do for javadoc linking, but that's not worth
>>> holding up 1.2 for.
>>
>> Cool. If you want me to go through and update the Modeler docs,
>> let me
>> know.
>>
>>> The only other reason I could see waiting is to make some sample
>>> apps
>>> for the various new features. Last I checked, there wasn't a
>>> solid ROP
>>> demo.
>>
>> I'm not sure if a mini-app was planned for release, but one of the
>> SoC
>> projects is an ROP demo.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 21 2006 - 08:14:55 EDT