+1 to a RC2
On 6/21/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> I am leaning towards doing an RC2 before the final. We have 12 issues
> marked as fixed since RC1 (mostly minor and/or specific to ROP, but
> still). How about an RC2 this Friday (right before ApacheCon)? I am
> feeling fairly certain about it being the last RC before final.
>
> Also I branched the main code [1] to be able to check in some new
> features I need for work. We'll merge them back to 3.0 when we are
> done with 1.2 and 2.0 (have to remember to do that before we rename
> the packages).
>
> Andrus
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/branches/
> PROTO-3.0/cayenne/
>
> On Jun 11, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > I guess we can decide on RC2 vs. final closer to the release date,
> > dependning on whether any new major bugs are discovered in the next
> > week
> > or so (there were hints at concurrency issues of the shared cache
> > that I
> > want to investigate).
> >
> > Also I wanted to give heads up on the docs work I am doing now.
> > Instead of
> > the three current tutorials (that look more like examples), I am
> > writing a
> > step by step guide showing how to map a DB schema, write a command
> > line
> > app (demonstrating Cayenne API) and turn it to a web app
> > (demonstrating
> > deployment tricks, rather than Struts or Tapestry). Once this is
> > done, I
> > want to extend this tutorial with ROP chapter(s) (something like
> > "take an
> > existing mapping, turn it to a web service, write a Java client").
> >
> > This (and general docs update) are the last tasks on my list.
> >
> > [1] http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/Tutorial+Scratchpad
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:22:33 -0400, Cris Daniluk
> >> <cris.danilu..mail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll probably have the docs finished for tomorrow. There's still
> >>> some
> >>> more stuff I want to do for javadoc linking, but that's not worth
> >>> holding up 1.2 for.
> >>
> >> Cool. If you want me to go through and update the Modeler docs,
> >> let me
> >> know.
> >>
> >>> The only other reason I could see waiting is to make some sample
> >>> apps
> >>> for the various new features. Last I checked, there wasn't a
> >>> solid ROP
> >>> demo.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if a mini-app was planned for release, but one of the
> >> SoC
> >> projects is an ROP demo.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 21 2006 - 08:57:21 EDT