Re: Shipping fat jar?

From: Craig L Russell (Craig.Russel..un.COM)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2007 - 17:52:14 EST

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "RE: Shipping fat jar?"

    On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

    >
    > On 04/01/2007, at 5:21 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >> That's true. I am trying to find an equally usable solution. So
    >> far I can think of a "lib/third-party" folder that I mentioned
    >> (and put into the new assembly descriptor).
    >
    > How about a very low tech approach. Create a file as part of the
    > deployment (or a web page for that matter), which lists every
    > dependency, the appropriate version (or range of versions), and the
    > URL of the place to get the jar. We do that in our own project so
    > that we can easily track what we are using and where we got it from.

    Doesn't the cayenne maven pom do this?

    Craig

    >
    > When Cayenne moved to skinny jars the way I figured out what
    > dependencies it needed was to keep running it, reading the
    > exception and then installing that jar. I guessed that the most
    > recent version of everything was the best thing to use, and they
    > worked fine, but it would be nice to know exactly what versions of
    > dependencies Cayenne is being tested with without reading the maven
    > xml files.
    >
    > Ari Maniatis
    >
    >
    >
    > -------------------------->
    > ish
    > http://www.ish.com.au
    > Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
    > phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
    > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
    >
    >

    Craig Russell
    Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
    408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russel..un.com
    P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 03 2007 - 17:52:43 EST