Tell me about it. We bought WO at the $50K price in 1999! Oh well, it was
only V.C. money.
We've found support from this mailing list (and the source) to be better
than Apple's. In fact we'd stopped paying for Apple's support a couple of
years ago because it was so seldom helpful.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dov Rosenberg" <dov.rosenber..onviveon.com>
To: "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienen..laska.net>;
<cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: Cayenne: Is it thread safe as compared to EOF?
> We have had pretty good performance for our 5.2 based application. The
only
> reason I am even considering a swap is the pricing for WO adds to the cost
> of our application. I would be very happy if WO went open source.
>
> I guess I should complain too much - it is certainly cheaper than it was a
> few years ago :)
>
>
> --
> Dov Rosenberg
> Conviveon Corporation
> http://www.conviveon.com
>
>
>
>
> On 2/10/05 6:00 PM, "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienen..laska.net> wrote:
>
> > Dov Rosenberg <dov.rosenber..onviveon.com> wrote:
> >> How does cayenne compare to WebObject/EOF when it comes to
multi-threaded
> >> operations?
> >
> > For one thing, it will perform non-serialized database operations unlike
> > WO5.0 and 5.1. I haven't upgraded to WO5.2 yet (on my todo list), but
> > WO5.2 is supposed to also support non-serialized database operations.
> >
> > You can perform as many simultaneous connections as you have specified
in
> > the connectionPool max setting for your driver.
> >
> > I know Andrus recently (and often in the past) answered questions about
> > thread safety issues. I recommend doing a search on the cayenne home
page
> > for "thread safe" and "thread-safe"
> >
> > Here's a couple, but you can find more.
> >
> > http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-user/2004/12/0104.html
> > http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-user/2004/04/0006.html
> >
> > -Mike
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 10 2005 - 20:23:05 EST